Business 201 Final Exam - 1437 Words

Principals of Management – 201 Final Chapter 8: 1. Define: Authority; Power; Responsibility. Briefly describe the differences between them. Authority refers to a manager’s inherent right to give orders, delegate tasks, make decisions and use resources as they see fit. Power refers to the extent that said manager is able to influence others so that they willing respond to orders. Authority and power are different from one another because while all managers have an inherent authority, not all of them have power over their employees. All managers can give orders, but they cannot all influence to the extent that their employees will follow their orders without question. Responsibility is the obligation that one has to†¦show more content†¦Reinforcement is the method by which employers provide incentives to their employees to work harder. These can come in the form of positive incentives, such as rewards or bonuses or negative incentives, such as a punishment. Chapter 13: 6. Briefly name and describe the 5 stages of group/team development. The five stages of group/team development are: forming, storming, norming, performing and adjourning. In the forming stage, the group members get aquainted with one another and figure out what the goals of the group are. In the storming stage, individual personalities within the group emerge and group members start to figure out what their roles will be. In the norming stage, the group begins to find unity and group members resolve their differences. In the performing stage, the group members solve problems and focus on completing their assigned task. In the adjourning stage, the group begins to disband and the members transition out and into other projects. Chapter 14: 7. What are the 5 sources of power that leaders/managers use? The five sources of powers that managers use are: legitimate power, reward power, coercive power, expert power and referent power. Legitimate power is an inherent power that all managers have simply because they are the manager and have authority over their subordinates. Reward power is a power that all managers have where they can promise or give rewards toShow MoreRelatedCurtin University Unit Outline for Scim2328 Words   |  10 PagesCurtin Business School School of Information Systems Unit Outline 13474 Supply Chain Information Management 201 Trimester 2A, 2013 Unit study package number: Mode of study: Tuition pattern summary: 13474 Internal Lecture: 1 x 1.5 Hours Weekly Computer Laboratory: 1 x 1.5 Hours Weekly This unit does not have a fieldwork component. Credit Value: Pre-requisite units: Co-requisite units: Anti-requisite units: Result type: Approved incidental fees: Unit coordinator: 25.0 Nil Nil 11955 (v.0) IntroductionRead MoreHi How R U Guys1542 Words   |  7 Pages * A good quality English-language dictionary (The Oxford Dictionary and the Longman’s Dictionary are recommended.) * A folder/portfolio to keep all your work throughout the semester Note: Electronic dictionaries are not permitted during exams * GRADING / ASSIGNMENTS Essays 2 x 10% 20% Summary Read MoreQuiz 1 STAT 3021313 Words   |  6 PagesState University was taken after the final business statistics exam to ask them whether they went partying the weekend before the final or spent the weekend studying, and whether they did well or poorly on the final. The following table contains the result.    Did Well on Exam Did Poorly on Exam Studying for Exam 60 15 Went Partying 22 53 If the sample is a good representation of the population, what percentage of those who did poorly on the final exam should we expect to have spent theRead MoreACC 290 new Final Exam Guide New1260 Words   |  6 Pagesï » ¿ACC 290 Final Exam Study Guide Let’s get started†¦ Q 8 – Under IFRS Comparative prior-period information must be presented and financial statements must be provided annually. Explanation: See IFRS financial reporting requirement here: http://www.iasplus.com/en/standards/ias/ias1 Q 10 - Similarities between International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) and U.S. GAAP include all of the following except: Both IFRS and U.S. GAAP allow revaluation of items such as land and buildings to fairRead MoreAccounting 202 Syllabus2947 Words   |  12 Pagesaccounting terminology to internally communicate economic events. They will be provided with the opportunity to understand how business organizations use accounting information for planning, controlling, and decision making and to apply appropriate technical accounting knowledge and skills to business problems. PREREQUISITES You must have already completed Accounting 201 with a grade of D- or better. COURSE SCHEDULE |Date | |Study Assignment Read MoreEssay on Business Admin2889 Words   |  12 Pagescinnes@fullerton.edu Course Prerequisites: Grade of C or above in English 101 and BUAD 201, or their equivalents. You may not be enrolled in BUAD 201 and BUAD 301 simultaneously. Course Description: In BUAD 301 you will build upon skills acquired and developed in BUAD 201. Using these basic, but crucial, communication skills you will continue to produce documents but of a more sophisticated nature. Whereas in BUAD 201 the messages were relatively straightforward, as you became familiar with producingRead MoreBanczero Case Essay2050 Words   |  9 PagesEconomics and Management This course for juniors and seniors explores firm strategies related to innovation and technological change. We focus on how the success of technological innovations—new products, processes, and services—depends on the firm’s business model. Other key topics include intellectual property rights and the management of technological uncertainty through organizational arrangements such as corporate venturing, spinoffs, and alliances. Technological change is a fundamental driverRead More Being A Mortician Essay1611 Words   |  7 Pagestask. You need to be twenty-one, a high school graduate with some undergraduate college work, as well as at least one year of professional training in mortuary science, and completion of an apprenticeship. quot;Upon completing a state board licensing exam, new funeral directors are qualified to join the staff of a funeral home. In many states successful completion of a national examination given by the National Conference of Examining boards will qualify you for licensurequot;(IRN 10). In differentRead MoreBeing a Mortician1669 Words   |  7 Pagestask. You need to be twenty-one, a high school graduate with some undergraduate college work, as well as at least one year of professional training in mortuary science, and completion of an apprenticeship. Upon completing a state board licensing exam, new funeral directors are qualified to join the staff of a funeral home. In many states successful completion of a national examination given by the National Conference of Examining boards will qualify you for licensure(IRN 10). In different statesRead MoreBusiness Management1669 Words   |  7 PagesBUSINESS AND TECHNICAL WRITING: FINAL EXAM PHOENIX ADVERTISING Roanoke Branch of Virginia 111 Main Street Roanoke, VA0002-0002 Phone: 1800-201-1111 Fax: 1800-222-2100 April1, 2010 Executive Team Phoenix Advertising 111 Main Street

Justus Case Free Essays

Just Us! Case Just Us! is a corporation that imports, roasts and sells primarily organic coffee from fair traded certified coffee producers. Their vision is: â€Å"to be a leading Fair Trade business that builds on quality, professionalism and innovation for the benefit of all our stake holders. Since its inception, Just Us! had experienced healthy growth in the maritime provinces of Canada, mainly supported by its corporate values: social and environmental responsibility, sustainability, ethical practices in all the areas of the business and in all stakeholders, and product differentiation. We will write a custom essay sample on Justus Case or any similar topic only for you Order Now They even opened a fair trade museum to help educate the public on the social impact and benefits of fair trade. Once roasted and packed, the coffee and other products are shipped to retail outlets, supermarket chains, health food stores, coffee shops and churches. A substantial portion of Just Us! revenues came from wholesaling to large retail stores such as supermarket chains. Their coffee is also offered in the Just Us cafes, which were meant to be a place where customers could enjoy a cup of premium fair trade coffee and gather information about fair trade. The locations were not standardized as a typical chain. A major competitor in the retail organic fair trade coffee market is Kicking Horse which also offers products that are certified organic and fair traded. Its main channels are: coffee shops, gourmet food stores, grocery chains and restaurants. The growth of fair trade product sales had prompted several major food brands to offer fair trade products, such as: Kraft Foods, Procter Gamble and Nestle. Also, in Canada, large super market chains such as Loblaws were offering also fair traded private labeled products which was concerning for Just Us, since supermarkets is one of its most important channels. In the coffee shop area, there was a lot of competition since some independent coffee shops and well-known chains (Ex. Starbucks) were trying to tap into the â€Å"fair trade trend†. Due to the original management team lack of marketing experience a new Marketing Director was hired and part of the initial issues she found was that Just Us! did not spend much on advertising. 2009 had been set at $20,000. There was a massive growth opportunity in the fair trade market in Canada but the economy was on recession, therefore, the expansion needed to be planned carefully. The marketing director had several specific questions to answer to help develop a marketing plan to bolster the growth of Just Us! First off, how was Just Us! going to target new buyers given the current competition and what segment would those buyers belong to? College students were clearly a growing customer base and Just Us! already had a strong presence in three college universities. Therefore, marketing should be directed at the young, educated demographic that are willing to pay a premium for products. Furthermore, the majority of their sales are business to business and their marketing needs to emphasize the benefits of fair trade to the end user. The case stated that the internet was a great tool for increasing awareness of fair trade products, along with initiatives that enhance word of mouth (p. 3). In order to reach new customers they should consider expanding their internet marketing, such as using search engine optimization/ search engine marketing. They can also utilize co-op advertising with other organizations that emphasize fair trade, organic, and environmentally friendly practices. The fair trade museum should also be utilized to educate potential customers and will be discussed in more detail below. All Just Us! advertising needs to emphasize the story behind the products in order to educate new customers. Educating customers on the benefits of fair trade is the key to growth and will set Just Us! apart from competitors with brand recognition. In order for Just Us! to enhance the cafe’s performance they need to improve the customer experience and become customers’ first choice of â€Å"place outside the home to enjoy coffee. Surveys and focus groups should be used to find out what customers like to do in their cafes as well as what customers like about the competitors cafes (Starbucks and Trident) and incorporate those into Just Us! ’ cafes. Additionally, the current Just Us! cafes are stand-alone destination shops. Just Us! should open up new stores in large commercial shopping centers in densely populated cities with multiple Universiti es. This would allow Just Us to still market to the young educated demographic that have long customer lifetime values that they have had success with and reach new customers via foot traffic in the shopping center. By keeping the overall educational theme about fair trade and brand awareness the same across all of the cafes should be able to convert new customers into loyal customers. Another questions the Marketing Director had to consider was how Just Us! can expand their loyal customer base? This could be achieved through improving the customer experience mentioned above. However, offering opportunities for the customers to get involved would create a concept of community among their customers and which could develop into a core competency and set them apart from their competitors. Just Us! ould achieve this by having guest speakers or workshops on fair trade in the stores or even get involved with community organizations to help educate people about fair trade. Customers could sign up to receive emails for upcoming events, new products, new services, and new social initiatives. These actions would all help expand their loyal customer base. The Marketing Director also needed to make several changes to the marketing program in order to benefit the cafes. The marketing budget should be increased to reflect the company sales and growth potentials. A larger budget will allow Just Us! o compete with similar fair trade coffee companies such as Java Factory and threatening new mainstream entrants such as Starbucks who can capture the market share quickly. The existing market media plan (Case exhibit 8) should be updated to focus on product differentiation and increase channel diversity. Just Us! should advertise in multiple newspapers, magazines, and outdoor locations to increase customer reach. Furthermore, Just Us! should promote more direct communication to events around colleges and young professionals emphasizing their fair trade and environment responsibility concept in order to foster community involvement. A major customer segment for Just Us is students and young professionals who are mostly tech-savvy. Therefore, internet should be a main advertising vehicle to reach mass marketing. Just Us should use internet marketing tools including emerging social media (e. g. Facebook, Tweeter, blogs), mobile advertisement (e. g. Groupon), search engine marketing, and co-op advertising on sites offering similar fair trade concepts. Finally, the Marketing Director needs to utilize the fair trade Museum as a way to spread awareness as well as promote brand awareness just like they should in the new locations but take it one step further. Just Us! could hold free concerts or guest speakers at the museum to attract potential new customers. They could also charge for the concert and allow free admission if you bring a reciept from a recent purchase at the Grand Pre store. Just Us! could sponsor a local race or work with local University fundraisers in the community. Once again, Just Us! needs to be involved with the community to educate people about fair trade and get their customers involved to create a sense of community that can lead to new customers and extend the lifetime customer value of existing customers. How to cite Justus Case, Essay examples

Encyclopedia of Global Bioethics Law †Free Samples to Students

Question: Discuss about the Encyclopedia of Global Bioethics Law. Answer: Introducrtion: Euthanasia is considered as a deliberate act that results in death caused by one person with the primary intention of terminating life of another person with a view to relieve that person from his or her sufferings. Euthanasia, which is also known as physician-assisted or assisted suicide or mercy killing, includes refusals of treatment, which includes life-support treatment or artificial nutrition and hydration[1]. There have been several arguments with respect to the legalization of euthanasia worldwide where some construe euthanasia as practice of terminating the life of a person without causing any further pain to such person. One the other hand, some considers the practice as a sin on religious ground. This essay discusses about the contrasting opinions regarding legalization of Euthanasia in two such countries UK and Luxembourg. The essay concludes with the impact of euthanasia on the society focusing on the difference in culture, morals and values of both the countries. In the United Kingdom, mercy killing there is no specific legislation that governs euthanasia instead circumstances that are described as euthanasia is often treated as manslaughter or murder in the UK. According to the Suicide Act of 1961, the practice of euthanasia is an offence amounting to criminal liability of the person assisting a person to terminate his/her life. The person liable for committing such offence shall be imposed a maximum penalty of life imprisonment in jail and for the commission of assisted suicide; the offender shall be imposed 14 years of imprisonment[2]. There is an important distinction between passive and active euthanasia in UK. Since the Bland ruling of 1993, assisted suicides which refers to the removal of life-saving care are not considered unlawful in the UK, but, active euthanasia which refers to any conduct that puts end to the life of another person, even without the consent of such person[3]. The only alternatives available for terminally ill patients in the UK are hospice care or refusal of treatment, which is applicable to patients suffering from mental disorder[4]. On the other hand, doctor assisted suicide or euthanasia is legal in a number of European countries such as Luxembourg. Luxembourg is the third European country that has legalized euthanasia on 16 March 2009 and has selected to adopt euthanasia clinics where the aged may decided to terminate their lives. However, In February 2008, the Luxembourg Chamber of Deputies adopted the Law on the Right to Die with Dignity[5]. The law encompasses both doctor-assisted suicides and euthanasia but a person who performs euthanasia or provide assistance in suicide must establish the presence of the following conditions. Firstly, the patient was statutorily competent while requesting for such assistance, in case the patient is 16 or below 18 years, has obtained consent of their parents. Secondly, the request is voluntary and the patient is suffering from an incurable medical condition resulting in unbearable physical or mental pain. The Law establishes a National Commission of Control and Evaluation to examine the implementation of the law. Luxembourg faced a constitutional crisis as the monarch of the country, Grand-Duke Henry, refused to sign the Euthanasia Bill into law on religious grounds. However, a significant change in the Luxembourgish Constitution was undertaken, which excluded signature of the head of the state for implementation any act of legislation. The primary factors that have influenced people in UK not to legalize euthanasia are the utilitarian role of governance and the inability of the government to control the violation of people taking life of other persons. Euthanasia weakens the respect for the sanctity of life and acceptance of euthanasia shall imply that the lives of the disabled are worth less than the lives of normal persons[6]. Voluntary euthanasia often leads to involuntary euthanasia and results in killing of people with physical and mental disability. From the religious perspectives, legalization of euthanasia shall be contrary to the will of God according to which committing, abetting or aiding suicide is a sin. In Luxembourg, Jean Huss, a member of parliament of the Green Party and the co-sponsor of the Euthanasia Bill had argued against non-legalization of euthanasia. He stated that conditions incorporated in the Die with Dignity law, shall permit euthanasia for people, who are terminally ill and with incurable disease that is making them suffer unbearable mental and physical pain[7]. Further, consent of such persons shall be mandatory along with the compulsory consent of two doctors and expert panels. The purpose of the Euthanasia Bill is not to terminate or kill somebody and neither for the doctors and parents. It is for the patients and only consent of the patient shall be final decision to put an end to his/her sufferings[8]. The central argument against euthanasia is that it might compel the old and disabled to terminate their life. However, the drafters of the Bill assure that right to die shall be applicable to those who shall use the option of euthanasia and not on others. Besides, Human Rights Act 1998, depriving a person to release oneself from unbearable sufferings shall amount to degrading and inhuman treatment[9]. From the above discussion, it can be inferred that the impact of legalizing euthanasia shall take into consideration of the impact it has on societal, governmental, institutional level as well apart from individual level. It is important to consider effect of legalizing the practice of mercy killing but also the impact such legislation would have on the society, values and societal institutions. The arguments in favor of legalizing euthanasia in Luxembourg is appropriate as it is based on the fact that despite the application of all possible measures to relieve the patient from his/her sufferings, the patient decides to terminate his/her life due to the unbearable pain, he/she should be entitled to be relieved from such unbearable pain[10]. While researching on this essay topic, I have not only gained sufficient knowledge about the concept of euthanasia and the legal impact of euthanasia on the society, its values and the societal institutions but also enhanced my skills in researching and writing an essay topic. The topic on euthanasia has enabled me to understand the difference in aspects in both the countries, UK and Luxembourg. United Kingdom considers the practice of mercy killing as manslaughter or murder, thus, amounting to criminal offence under the Suicide Act 1961. However, researches revealed there are various differences in perspectives towards the legalization of euthanasia in Luxembourg[11]. While preparing this essay, I have been able to outline the structure in the introduction part of the essay and proceed with the entire essay according to the structure of the essay plan. This essay was structured in a way that it explained the concept of euthanasia in the introduction and the impact of the practice of mercy killing in the United Kingdom and Luxembourg. As per the essay structure, the viewpoints on legalizations of euthanasia in both the countries have been explained elaborately. After conducting further extensive research about the factors, that had influenced the United Kingdom not to favor legalization of the practice of mercy killing and the influencing factors that have led to the legalization of euthanasia in Luxembourg, I have briefly stated the same. I could mention them briefly due to the restricted word count that was allotted to complete the essay. However, although there is a difference between both the countries with respect to their legalization of euthanasia, the arguments that do not favor its legalization are similar. The central argument against euthanasia is that it would affect aged persons who shall be compelled to terminate their life. However, the Euthanasia Bill states that right to die shall have an impact on those who shall use the option of euthanasia and not on others. Researching on such arguments explains that people not favoring the legalization base their arguments primarily on religious and moral grounds. I have learnt that member of Churches and other people who do not favor euthanasia are of the opinion that God is the ultimate creator and only He has the right to put an end to a life. Any other person who attempts to take away the lives of other persons is sinners and is acting against morality and societal institutions[12]. Thus, this essay paper has not only enabled me to enhance my writing and research skills but it has helped me gain a much wider knowledge about euthanasia. This experience shall help me use my writing and research skills as a legal executive while drafting and dealing with cases related to euthanasia in future, thus, giving a boost to my career. Reference list Annadurai, Kalaivani, Raja Danasekaran, and Geetha Mani. "'Euthanasia: Right to die with dignity'."Journal of family medicine and primary care3.4 (2014): 477. Cohen, Joachim. "Acceptance of euthanasia and the factors influencing it."Entscheidungen am Lebensende. Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH Co. KG, 2016. Danyliv, Andriy, and Ciaran O'Neill. "Attitudes towards legalising physician provided euthanasia in Britain: The role of religion over time."Social Science Medicine128 (2015): 52-56. Dierickx, Sigrid, et al. "Involvement of palliative care in euthanasia practice in a context of legalized euthanasia: A population-based mortality follow-back study."Palliative Medicine(2017): 0269216317727158. Gordon, Daniel, Claire E. Raphael, and Vassilios Vassiliou. "Assisted dyingshould the UK change its stance?."Medicine, Science and the Law 55.2 (2015): 71-77. Hudson, Peter, et al. "Legalizing physician-assisted suicide and/or euthanasia: Pragmatic implications."Palliative supportive care13.5 (2015): 1399-1409. Inbadas, Hamilton, et al. "Declarations on euthanasia and assisted dying."Death studies(2017): 1-11. Kimsma, Gerrit. "Euthanasia: Active."Encyclopedia of Global Bioethics. Springer International Publishing, 2016. 1178-1188. Radbruch, Lukas, et al. "Euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide: a white paper from the European Association for Palliative Care."Palliative medicine30.2 (2016): 104-116. Seale, Clive. "Analysis of health communication texts: UK press coverage of debates about assisted dying."Mtode Science Studies Journal-Annual Review6 (2016). Sharp, Shane. "Belief in miracles and attitudes towards voluntary euthanasia."Death studies41.4 (2017): 211-219. Subba, Sonu Hangma, et al. "Doctors Attitude Towards Euthanasia: A Cross-sectional Study."Journal of The Association of Physicians of India64 (2016): 44.